Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- projects:hpx:start [2020/05/29 01:14] – agaev
+++ projects:hpx:start [2020/05/29 16:31] – agaev
@@ Line 62: / Line 62: @@
 Дополнительные вещи, не из стандарта:
 hazptr_array<N> для N hazptr-ов сразу, быстрее.
 hazptr_local<N> немного быстрее, но обязывает иметь ровно 1 активный hazptr_* на поток
@@ Line 109: / Line 111: @@
 ====== Аргумент против standard proposal(Hooks) ======
 [[https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_54_0/doc/html/intrusive/usage.html|Boost.Intrusive]]
 В стандарте сейчас используется что-то похожее на base_hook
 В Boost.Intrusive говорится(И это и есть аргумент):
-	Sometimes an 'is-a' relationship between list hooks and the list value types is not desirable. In this case, using a member hook as a data member instead of 'disturbing' the hierarchy might be the right way:
+	Sometimes an 'is-a' relationship between list hooks and the list value types is not desirable.
+	In this case, using a member hook as a data member instead of 'disturbing' the hierarchy might be the right way:
 А потом ещё и
-	A programmer might find that base or member hooks are not flexible enough in some situations. In some applications it would be optimal to put a hook deep inside a member of a class or just outside the class. Boost.Intrusive has an easy option to allow such cases: function_hook.
+	A programmer might find that base or member hooks are not flexible enough in some situations.
+	In some applications it would be optimal to put a hook deep inside a member of a class or just outside the class.
+	Boost.Intrusive has an easy option to allow such cases: function_hook.
 ===== Как можно исправить =====
@@ Line 166: / Line 173: @@
 В массиве HP в libcds хранится каст к void*. В proposal'е каст к hazptr_obj_base*.
 Моя идея в том, чтобы как и в Boost.Intrusive, добавить к hazptr_domain или hazard_pointer::protect шаблонный параметр, указывающий на то, как получать hazptr_ptr из нашего класса